The request for specialized icebreakers — essential for navigating Arctic waters — has emerged as a key point of leverage in ongoing trade negotiations between Washington and Seoul.
The Alaska LNG project, a multibillion-dollar endeavor requiring the construction of a 1,300-kilometer gas pipeline, is expected to deliver approximately 3.5 billion cubic feet of gas per day from the North Slope fields.
However, the project’s success hinges on securing icebreaking vessels — an area where the U.S. has limited domestic capacity.
South Korea’s Minister of Trade, Industry, and Energy, Ahn Duk-geun, underscored his country’s readiness to assist during a February visit to Washington. This reflected Seoul’s broader effort to demonstrate its capability to meet a pressing American need amid broader trade discussions.
South Korea’s major shipbuilders — HD Hyundai Heavy Industries, Samsung Heavy Industries, and Hanwha Ocean — possess the technical expertise to construct icebreakers.
Both Samsung and Hanwha have previously supplied similar vessels to global markets. Yet, despite their capabilities, these companies face a formidable logistical challenge: their shipbuilding slots are fully booked until 2028, raising concerns over whether they can accommodate new American orders within a viable timeframe.
Further complicating the matter is the Jones Act, which mandates that ships operating in U.S. coastal waters be built domestically. This restriction presents a significant barrier to direct exports of Korean-built icebreakers. Industry experts suggest alternative approaches, such as manufacturing vessel components in Korea for final assembly in the United States or acquiring American shipyards to comply with U.S. law.
Hanwha Ocean has already taken steps in this direction, recently acquiring Philadelphia Shipyard through its subsidiary, Hanwha Systems. Other shipbuilders are weighing similar investments as they assess potential entry points into the North American market.
Beyond governmental negotiations, industry leaders recognize the strategic value of participation. “This represents more than just fulfilling a government request — it’s an opportunity to establish a foothold in the North American market,” said an executive at a leading Korean shipbuilder.
Still, significant financial considerations loom over any potential solution. Whether through contract modifications or shipyard acquisitions, the costs of adapting to U.S. regulatory constraints remain substantial.
“While accommodating American requests is important at a national level, private enterprises must carefully balance potential profits against the investments required,” noted another industry insider.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.