The newspaper said Iranian factions that had rallied around the government during airstrikes have begun to fracture again since a cease-fire, with disputes widening over whether to pursue talks with Washington.
According to the report, political forces closed ranks during the strikes to confront what was described as a war for survival. But three weeks after the cease-fire took effect, long-running disputes have resurfaced and debate has intensified over Iran’s next steps.
The central issue is whether to negotiate with the United States over the nuclear program. Opposition to talks has grown, particularly among hard-liners, who have targeted Parliament Speaker Mohammad Bagher Ghalibaf. The report said he led outreach after meeting U.S. Vice President JD Vance in Pakistan on April 11.
Politicians aligned with the hard-line Paydari faction criticized the negotiating team, saying it did not sufficiently follow guidance from the supreme leader. Mahmoud Nabavian, a lawmaker identified as part of Paydari, told local media that “negotiations are a total loss and no one should enter negotiations.” He called it a “strategic mistake” to include the nuclear program on the agenda.
On April 27, 261 of Iran’s 290 lawmakers adopted a statement backing the negotiating team, but key Paydari figures did not sign, the report said.
Analysts also said uncertainty is growing because of the supreme leader’s absence. Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has not appeared in public since the war, and the decision-making structure is reported to be strained. The report said veteran figures who had managed internal disputes for decades died early in the airstrikes, leaving a newer leadership with less crisis-management experience.
President Donald Trump cited the turmoil when he announced over the weekend that he was canceling the dispatch of a second negotiating team. “There is tremendous infighting and chaos in Iran’s leadership. No one, including themselves, knows who is in charge,” he said.
Iran has reportedly proposed an end-of-war framework to the United States that includes reopening the Strait of Hormuz, imposing transit fees on ships and maintaining its right to enrich uranium. Secretary of State Marco Rubio called the proposal “better than expected,” but said it was unclear whether the person who made it had real authority.
Iranian leaders have urged unity. Ghalibaf, President Masoud Pezeshkian and the head of the judiciary wrote on X, formerly Twitter, “In our Iran, there are no hard-liners or moderates. We are all Iranians and revolutionaries.”
Still, Khamenei’s seclusion is seen as making coordination difficult. One source said most people want a cease-fire, but “even minimal communication between the supreme leader and lower-level organizations is almost impossible.”
Concerns are also rising inside Iran that if negotiations stall, the country could slide back toward full-scale war with the United States and Israel. Reformist politician Mohammad Sadegh Javadi Hessar criticized hard-liners for continuing to push back, calling it self-destructive and saying they were seeking room for their own political future.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.