No public agency earned an “excellent” (Grade 1) rating in last year’s government safety management assessment, officials said. Korea Coal Corp. was the only agency rated “very poor” (Grade 5), while Korea Expressway Corp., Korea East-West Power Co. and Korea Land and Housing Corp. (LH) were among those rated “poor” (Grade 4).
The Finance and Economy Ministry said it confirmed the results on Tuesday at the fifth meeting of the Public Institutions Steering Committee, chaired by Vice Finance and Economy Minister Heo Jang, approving the “2025 Public Institutions Safety Management Rating Review Results.”
Reflecting measures announced in September to strengthen safety management at public institutions, the government expanded the review 대상 from 73 agencies a year earlier to 104 and tightened evaluations of construction sites, where fatal accidents account for a large share, the ministry said.
In the assessment of last year’s safety performance, none of the 104 agencies received Grade 1. A total of 21 received Grade 2, 77 received Grade 3, five received Grade 4 and one received Grade 5, the ministry said.
Korea Coal Corp. ranked last with a “very poor” rating, with officials citing weaknesses across its safety management system. The “poor” group included state-run companies such as Korea Expressway Corp., Korea East-West Power and LH.
As in the previous year, no agency received Grade 1. Compared with a year earlier, the number of Grade 2 agencies rose by one, Grade 3 agencies increased by 26, and agencies rated Grade 4 or below rose by four, leaving most clustered in the middle. Since the safety rating system was introduced in 2020, the share of agencies in the mid-to-upper tiers (Grades 2 and 3) has increased to 94.2% of all institutions, the ministry said.
The government said agencies rated Grades 4 and 5 must complete consulting and training from safety 전문기관 and report improvement results quarterly to their supervising ministries.
“The safety management rating review system is strengthening accountability among public institution management and helping establish a safety culture,” Heo said. “But public concerns about safety persist, so we will continue to develop the system.”
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.