Samsung Electronics, South Korea's largest company, has avoided a total strike but has accepted a tentative agreement that ties a portion of its operating profit to long-term performance bonuses. This move has raised concerns that it could set a new standard for compensation practices across South Korean companies.
According to industry sources on May 21, Samsung Electronics' management and labor union reached a dramatic agreement around 10:30 p.m. the previous day, postponing a planned total strike and agreeing on wage and performance bonus terms. The agreement will be put to a vote among union members from May 23 to 28.
The anticipated first strike in the company's history has been halted. However, if the agreement passes the union vote, Samsung will be obligated to pay special management performance bonuses annually for the next ten years, contingent on achieving a minimum operating profit threshold. This effectively institutionalizes the allocation of some operating performance to long-term compensation.
Allowing bonuses for loss-making divisions poses a larger issue. During negotiations, both sides reportedly found common ground by recognizing a certain level of distribution for loss-making units, deferring penalties for one year. Despite management's insistence on the principle of rewarding performance, they ultimately conceded.
Professor Hwang Yong-sik of Sejong University expressed concern, stating, "Institutionalizing performance bonuses in loss-making situations could undermine the principle of meritocracy. Compensation should be the result of performance, and broadly recognizing losses could lead to moral hazard, increased cost rigidity, and weaken companies' investment capacity."
In the business community, there are concerns that this agreement could serve as a 'new normal' for labor relations in South Korea, given the tendency of local companies to benchmark Samsung's practices. A precedent has been set where unions may demand a share of corporate profits.
Despite government mediation, the agreement tilted in favor of the union, raising the likelihood of similar demands in low-performing or loss-making divisions in the future. This is particularly concerning in cyclical industries such as refining, shipbuilding, batteries, automotive, and steel, where performance-based bonuses tied to peak results could severely impact corporate management.
A representative from a major corporation noted, "Samsung has effectively served as a benchmark for the compensation system in Korean manufacturing. This agreement is likely to lead to other large companies facing similar demands, with unions arguing, 'If Samsung can do it, why can't we?'"
If the tentative agreement is approved by union members, the total strike will be called off. However, the 'Samsung situation' may not be over but rather just beginning, as internal conflicts over performance bonuses and compensation pressures across industries are expected to intensify.
Kim Yong-seok, a distinguished professor at Gachon University's Semiconductor School and a former Samsung employee, cautioned, "Fixing temporary performance due to market improvements into a decade-long system is quite risky, especially with a structure that distributes bonuses to loss-making divisions, which could weaken motivation across the entire organization."
He added, "The compensation structure created by Samsung could influence other corporate unions, making it difficult to rule out demands for minimum compensation even in loss-making situations across other industries."
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.