SEOUL, June 22 (AJP) - "It is a management error, but the entire staff has to pay the price. It's like the whole family being forced to attend an alcohol awareness class after the father gets caught drinking and driving," one Starbucks Korea employee grumbled.
More than 2,000 Starbucks Korea stores closed early at 3 p.m. Monday for a crash course in democracy history to make amends for last month's "Tank Day" blunder.
The self-imposed remedial measure suspended operations for around six hours across the country's largest coffee chain.
Its parent, Shinsegae Group, dismissed the head of Starbucks Korea, ordered a companywide review of marketing procedures and arranged history and social sensitivity training for Chairman Chung Yong-jin and executives from more than 10 affiliates.
The response was swift, visible and expensive.
Whether it will work is a different question — and for some of the people most affected by it, the answer is far from clear.
The wrong people in the room
Outside a Starbucks in Gwanghwamun on Monday, Kim In-su, 52, was waiting for a friend when he learned the store would be closing early. He knew about the training. He was not convinced it was reaching the people responsible.
"The Tank Day promotion was made by the marketing people up top," he said. "Why are the baristas — the ones who make the coffee — the ones being called in while stores are shut down? It's strange."
Kim also questioned whether recorded lectures could meaningfully improve historical awareness.
Still, he was not dismissive of the issue itself.
"Gwangju is a painful wound for this country," he said. "People need to understand it properly, and something like this must never happen again."
Kim Su-jin, 21, a university student from Yongin, said she had been a regular Starbucks customer before the controversy. She still visits, but less often.
"It's a historical wound for our country, and they used it casually for marketing," she said. "Then people higher up simply waved it through without thinking carefully. That's what put me off."
The practical calculation has changed as well.
"There are so many good coffee places in Korea now," she said. "As a student, a 2,000-won coffee does the same job as a 4,500-won Starbucks. I've been thinking about that more lately."
She drew a parallel to a separate controversy involving fashion platform Musinsa, which faced backlash after a campaign was perceived as trivializing the memory of democracy activist Park Jong-cheol.
"One more moment of thought would have prevented it," she said. "That's what's frustrating. It's the people at the top whose historical awareness needs to change."
Their skepticism points to a broader question that extends well beyond Starbucks Korea: when a company causes this kind of harm, what does a credible response actually look like?
The evidence from past cases is not especially reassuring.
The D&G case: When saying sorry made things worse
The most frequently cited reference point is Dolce & Gabbana's collapse in China in 2018.
That November, the Italian fashion house released a promotional video showing a Chinese model awkwardly attempting to eat Italian food with chopsticks while a patronizing voiceover narrated the scene.
The backlash was immediate.
Tmall, JD.com and other major e-commerce platforms pulled D&G products within hours. More than a dozen celebrities terminated endorsement contracts. A Shanghai runway show, months in the making, was canceled on the very day it was scheduled to open.
Co-founders Domenico Dolce and Stefano Gabbana issued a personal video apology within days.
It did not help.
YouGov data showed the brand's health score plunging from positive 3.3 to negative 11.4 even after the apology was released. D&G's Asia-Pacific revenue contribution fell from 25 percent in fiscal 2018 to 22 percent the following year. Its number of boutiques in greater China shrank from 58 in 2018 to 47 by 2021.
The problem was not the apology itself, but the context surrounding it.
Private Instagram messages in which Stefano Gabbana appeared to insult China had already circulated widely.
The sequence — private contempt followed by public remorse — made the apology appear transactional rather than genuine.
The D&G episode is an extreme example, but the underlying pattern is remarkably consistent with crisis management research.
Studies have repeatedly found that a full apology — one that acknowledges wrongdoing, expresses regret and outlines corrective actions — is more effective in rebuilding trust than denial or vague expressions of regret.
Researchers have identified four recurring elements that determine whether an apology resonates: regret, reason, reparation and reaffirmation.
Consumers are not merely evaluating what a company says. They are judging whether the company explains what went wrong, repairs the damage and demonstrates that the same mistake is unlikely to happen again.
Measured against those criteria, Starbucks Korea's response contains several favorable elements.
The promotion was withdrawn quickly. The head of the Korean operator was dismissed. Companywide training was announced publicly and carried out with visible disruption to normal operations.
But the consumers interviewed Monday raised the same questions highlighted by crisis management research: who is being held accountable, and does the remedy reach those most directly harmed?
May 18 is not a generic issue of cultural sensitivity in South Korea.
It marks the anniversary of the 1980 Gwangju uprising, during which military forces deployed tanks and armored vehicles against pro-democracy demonstrators, leaving hundreds dead or injured.
The use of tank imagery on that date was not an abstract mistake.
Victims' families and civic groups in Gwangju have called for a direct response.
The mechanics of rebuilding trust are therefore different.
Sincerity is measured not by what a company says, but by what it does next — and how directly it addresses the people who were harmed.
The company has closed its stores for six hours, but whether that's enough for Gwangju citizens, it remains to be seen.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.