South Korea's journey in the 2026 North and Central America World Cup ended in the group stage, with hopes of advancing to the knockout round dashed as they failed to secure a third-place finish. While strong teams can be eliminated and underdogs can surprise, it is not solely the performance on the field that warrants criticism. If this exit is attributed only to a lack of skill or player underperformance, South Korean football risks repeating the same failures. The most pressing issue left by this tournament is the leadership and operational system of the Korean Football Association (KFA).
When the national team underperforms, the head coach typically bears the brunt of the blame. Head Coach Hong Myung-bo is no exception. However, the coach is chosen by the association, and the ultimate responsibility for team support, technical administration, and operations lies with the KFA. If the association attempts to shift all accountability by merely replacing the coach, the lessons that should be learned from this World Cup will be lost.
The appointment of Hong Myung-bo was controversial from the start. While the KFA claimed that the process was sound, many in the football community and fans were not convinced. The evaluation of foreign coach candidates was not sufficiently transparent, and the final decision-making process was also mired in questions of transparency. This led to audits by the Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism and inquiries in the National Assembly, leaving the appointment process as a symbolic controversy in Korean football administration. The public's concern was not about a specific coach but rather about the method of selection. They questioned not only whether regulations were followed but also whether the process was reasonable.
This controversy is not an isolated incident. Under the leadership of President Chung Mong-kyu, the KFA has repeatedly lost public trust. The attempt to pardon those involved in match-fixing was withdrawn after intense criticism, and the processes surrounding the appointment and dismissal of Coach Jurgen Klinsmann revealed a lack of leadership. The failure to qualify for the Paris Olympics raised alarms about the competitiveness of South Korean football, and the controversies surrounding coach appointments have led to fundamental questions about the association's decision-making structure. At critical junctures, the KFA has repeatedly stated that there were no procedural issues, but what the public expected was not just formal legality but a transparent process and accountable explanations.
Recently, criticisms regarding the coach appointment process and the KFA's operations have spilled over into the political arena. Lawmakers from both sides of the aisle have called for a review of the association's decision-making methods and accountability structures. This indicates that the controversies surrounding the KFA are no longer confined to the football community. As an organization managing a national team that enjoys public interest and affection, it is only natural that it should possess a high level of accountability and transparency.
While the national team lost on the field, the greater defeat lies in the loss of public trust. Trust does not crumble overnight. It is the result of a culture that prioritizes outcomes over processes, organizational logic over criticism, and a lack of accountability in the face of failure. The issues that were hidden during periods of success have surfaced all at once as results have declined, and this is not coincidental.
This World Cup should not be recorded as the failure of a single coach. It must be recognized as a failure of football administration that disregarded fundamentals and principles and failed to create a process that the public could accept. Before discussing whether to replace the coach, the KFA must engage in self-reflection. It should reassess whether its coach selection system is objective, whether its decision-making is transparent, and whether it has a culture of accountability. The heavier task than failing to reach the knockout stage is the restoration of trust. If the KFA cannot uphold fundamentals, principles, and common sense, no great coach or generation of players will be able to revive South Korean football.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.