According to political sources on June 29, a lawmakers' meeting that was expected to address Jang's future concluded without significant discussion. Choi Eun-seok, the party's chief spokesperson, told reporters after the meeting, "Today's gathering was primarily to explain the progress of the negotiations regarding the assembly's composition and to hear the opinions of the members." Another lawmaker present noted, "The meeting wrapped up early without any opinions beyond those related to the committees."
The lack of open conflict during the meeting is attributed to a shared understanding among members that they need to concentrate on the ongoing negotiations with the Democratic Party regarding the assembly's composition, rather than exposing internal strife.
A first-term lawmaker commented in a phone interview with Aju Economy, "In previous meetings, we discussed various issues, and there was a consensus that we should step back and take time to reflect to avoid heated confrontations."
He also expressed concern over the government's plans for a large-scale semiconductor investment in the Honam region, stating, "This is progressing in a very abnormal manner," and added, "It is not beneficial for anyone to engage in unproductive internal conflicts at such a critical time."
Furthermore, he remarked, "We are divided and have many conflicts, so we lack effective responses," and noted that many lawmakers are worried about the party experiencing chaos and division, which would prevent it from functioning properly.
Earlier that day, a Supreme Council meeting saw a heated exchange between pro-establishment and anti-establishment factions over Jang's resignation. Pro-establishment member Woo Jae-jun stated, "Our leadership talks about being a 'one team,' but all I remember is discipline," urging Jang to resign if party members view each other as adversaries.
In response, pro-establishment member Kim Min-soo countered, "All I remember Woo doing is publicly insulting the leader elected by the party members. If they feel so strongly about their responsibilities, they should resign themselves."
Jang reiterated, "Regardless of any decisions made at the lawmakers' meeting or comments made at the Supreme Council, I will not resign," clearly indicating his stance against stepping down. He reportedly challenged those calling for his resignation during a closed Supreme Council meeting, saying, "If any of the Supreme Council members wish to resign, they should do so right here."
With both parties at an impasse over the assembly's composition negotiations, it is expected that discussions regarding Jang's future will remain quiet for the time being. However, the People Power Party's Ethics Committee is scheduled to meet early next month to decide on disciplinary matters, which could reignite internal tensions.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.