What Grammys lost when BTS walked away

By Park Sae-jin Posted : July 30, 2026, 10:05 Updated : July 30, 2026, 10:10
BTS leader RM announces the group's decision not to submit its music to this year's Grammy Awards in a post shared on his Instagram account on July 29, 2026. All seven members posted the same statement, writing that they hope music will be heard and loved for what it is rather than categorized by region or language. Screenshot from RM's Instagram

For five years, BTS wanted a Grammy, and the wanting was never hidden. The group submitted its music every cycle. Its members flew to Las Vegas and delivered performances that outclassed the ceremony hosting them, went home with nothing, and returned the next year to try again.

On the red carpet in 2022, RM told American cable TV entertainment news operation E! News that the previous two years had been exhausting and devastating, and that a Grammy would make it all pay off. He said this as the leader of the best-selling act on the planet, which tells you the trophy had stopped being a prize somewhere along the way and had become something closer to a verdict he was waiting to hear.

I watched that ceremony live on a Monday morning in the newsroom, the way Korea always watches American award shows, at the wrong hour and with too much riding on it. About 15 of us stood around the television, editors and reporters still in face masks in those pandemic days.

When the "Butter" performance ended, nobody said anything, and nobody needed to. Whatever a world-class act was, we had just watched one. Minutes later the award went to someone else, and the gap between what we had seen and what the voters had seen was the whole story, though it would take four more years for BTS to say so themselves.

They said it on July 29. Each of the seven members posted the same brief statement announcing that the group would not submit its music to the Grammys this year, adding a hope that music might be heard and loved for what it is rather than sorted by region or language.

Big Hit Music asked that the statement be taken as written, and taken as written it is remarkable, because it asks for nothing. A boycott makes demands. This made none, set no conditions, named no grievance, and offered the Recording Academy no way to win them back. You negotiate with an institution whose judgment you still need. The one whose judgment you have outgrown, you simply inform.

The timeline explains what the statement declined to. In February, the Grammys had their most open night in memory: Bad Bunny won Album of the Year with a record sung entirely in Spanish, the first in the award's history, while a song from an animated film about Korean pop stars became the first K-pop recording ever to take home a Grammy, its writers giving their acceptance speech in English and Korean both. For one evening, the ceremony resembled its own advertising, a room where the language of a song was no obstacle to its honor.

In March, BTS came back from military service with ARIRANG, which opened with the biggest American sales week any group had posted in more than a decade. And in June, with BTS holding the number one album and number one song in the Academy's home market, the Recording Academy unveiled a new category: Best Asian Pop Music Performance, reserved for songs making meaningful use of an Asian language.

Read that rule against the group's own history and it curdles. The song that earned BTS its first Grammy nomination was "Dynamite," performed entirely in English. Under the new category's terms, "Dynamite" would not qualify. So the institution that recognized these seven men only when they sang in English has now prepared a room they may enter only if they sing in Korean, and whichever language they choose, the room is never the main one.

I doubt anyone at the Academy designed this on purpose. It reads like reflex, the old institutional habit of responding to a periphery grown too large to ignore by building an annex rather than widening the center.

The Recording Academy has met this habit in itself before. In 2020, it renamed Best World Music Album as Best Global Music Album, conceding that the old term carried what it delicately called connotations of colonialism. "World," it turned out, had always meant everyone else, and the category had functioned as a holding pen with a friendly name.

The Academy admitted as much and collected praise for the admission. Five years later, the pen has been rebuilt with Asia written on the gate. The vocabulary improved in the renaming. The habit did not.

Bong Joon-ho saw all of this coming, in his own field, in the fall of 2019. Asked by Vulture why no Korean film had ever been nominated for an Oscar, a question resting on the assumption that Korea owed Hollywood an explanation for its absence, Bong refused the premise entirely and observed that the Oscars are not an international film festival but a very local one.

The line traveled the world as a burn. It was actually a measurement, taken without heat, of an institution that had confused its own size with the size of the world, and it stung precisely because it was accurate and nobody in that world had been positioned to say it aloud. Four months later the Academy gave Parasite its highest prize, which was called history, though it might as easily be called an institution scrambling to agree with him.

BTS has taken Bong's measurement and reached the opposite door, and the difference lies not in the judgment but in what each institution offered. Hollywood, once measured, opened its front entrance, so Bong walked in. The Recording Academy, once measured, offered a side entrance with a language test, so BTS walked out. These look like opposite choices. They are the same choice, made by Korean artists who stopped letting an American ceremony decide how large they were.

The strongest case for entering anyway sat in February's ceremony itself, where Bad Bunny collected the open field's greatest prize and a specialty award in the same evening, proving a category can be a floor rather than a ceiling. But he arrived at that ceremony with something left to win. BTS would arrive with nothing to win and one thing to lose.

Five nominations in open competition, five losses: that zero has hardened into a monument, and what it indicts is not the music, on which the world ruled long ago, but the room. Let BTS claim the inaugural Asian award and the monument inverts. The story of the group the Grammys failed to honor becomes the story of the group that finally won, in the category built for it, and a decade of open-field defeats gets quietly refiled as evidence the annex was needed all along.

So the Academy will lose nothing visible in February. Award shows are practiced at not noticing who is missing, and the broadcast will glitter as usual. What it lost on July 29 is the thing no broadcast can generate.

An award has no value of its own; it is worth exactly what the wanting of it is worth, and the wanting must be freely given. For five years the biggest band on earth gave it freely, showing up, performing, losing, returning, lending the ceremony the one asset it cannot manufacture, the sight of someone enormous still hoping.

That hope was always the Grammys' property more than BTS's weakness. It has now been withdrawn, without anger, without demands, in a statement short enough to fit on a phone screen, by seven men who knocked at a door for years and were at last, generously, offered a smaller one.

Submissions for the 69th Grammy Awards close on August 28. The ceremony follows on February 7 at Crypto.com Arena in Los Angeles, where last February, for one night, the room briefly resembled the world. BTS will not be there to see whether it happens again.

Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.