The National Education Commission is stirring discussions in the education sector by proposing the introduction of essay-type evaluations in the College Scholastic Ability Test (CSAT) as part of a long-term reform plan for college admissions. While there is a consensus on the educational intent to foster students' critical thinking and creativity, experts and educators are raising concerns about the 'fairness of grading' and the 'realistic college admissions timeline' as reasons to be cautious about hasty implementation. The success of the reform plan ultimately hinges on how to secure 'public trust' in the evaluation process.
On August 5, the National Education Commission announced during a briefing with President Lee Jae-myung that it is considering expanding essay-type evaluations in middle and high schools, introducing essay-type questions in the CSAT, and transitioning to absolute evaluation for internal assessments and the CSAT as part of the '2028-2037 National Education Development Plan.'
Iman-ki, head of the Education Evaluation Research Institute at Yuhwa, positively assessed the expansion of essay-type evaluations, noting that it could move away from rote memorization and better assess students' thought processes and problem-solving abilities, aligning with the goals of the high school credit system.
However, he pointed out that ensuring 'objectivity and fairness in grading' poses the biggest challenge due to the nature of the CSAT, which sees hundreds of thousands of examinees. If discrepancies arise in scores among different graders for the same answers, the credibility of the exam could be severely undermined.
He also warned that a new form of private education focused on memorizing writing structures and answer formats could expand, and students' handwriting or language expression abilities might become variables outside of their academic competencies.
Iman-ki advised, "Instead of introducing lengthy essay-type questions on a large scale from the outset, it would be better to gradually implement questions that allow for relatively objective grading, such as short-answer questions in mathematics that focus on problem-solving processes."
Concerns were also raised regarding the proposed adjustment of the college admissions timeline under the guise of normalizing the second semester of the third year of high school. Iman-ki noted that if all processes, including document submissions, essays, interviews, and announcements of successful candidates, are conducted from after the CSAT until February of the following year, the schedule could become overly compressed, leading to poor evaluations by universities.
In fact, criticisms have emerged from the college admissions field regarding the impracticality of compressing the admissions timeline. A university admissions official stated, "Multiple grading is essential, but there remains the issue of how to handle significant score discrepancies among graders," emphasizing the need for clear evaluation criteria.
Regarding the proposal to delay the admissions timeline, the official remarked, "Compressing the schedule from after the CSAT to February overlooks the existing college transfer schedule concentrated in December and January," indicating that it is essentially unfeasible. As an alternative, they suggested referencing Germany's 'Abitur.'
The Abitur, mentioned by the university official, is Germany's university entrance qualification exam, which primarily consists of essay-type and oral evaluations. To ensure grading fairness, it clearly stipulates a dual grading system involving both internal and external teachers, and if significant score discrepancies arise, a third grader or committee intervenes to adjust the final score. Additionally, the exam and grading periods are conducted over weeks to months, allowing ample time.
Thus, for the full implementation of essay-type questions in the Korean CSAT, it is necessary to establish a clear agreement mechanism to address grading discrepancies and a thorough dual grading system, alongside a structural overhaul of the current compressed admissions timeline from November to February to ensure the quality of evaluations.
Teachers' unions are also calling for a measured approach based on concerns about fairness and practicality. The Korean Federation of Teachers' Associations stated, "In a situation where the high school credit system and the five-grade internal assessment system have just been fully implemented, discussing absolute evaluation for internal assessments and essay-type CSAT simultaneously is premature," adding, "It should not be enforced without ensuring transparency and fairness in grading and addressing concerns about increased private education."
The Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union also emphasized that the introduction of AI evaluation systems, mentioned as grading aids, should prioritize sufficient consultation with the field regarding data protection and the safeguarding of teachers' final judgment rights.
Ultimately, for the National Education Commission's college admissions reform plan to take off smoothly, it is essential to prioritize ample pilot operations and gradual implementation over hasty full-scale introduction. Additionally, education experts agree that to prevent the dilution of the CSAT and internal assessments from leading to the revival of university-specific exams or an increase in private education, a common differentiation system for selecting top-tier universities must be established, making social consensus a key to success.
On August 5, the National Education Commission announced during a briefing with President Lee Jae-myung that it is considering expanding essay-type evaluations in middle and high schools, introducing essay-type questions in the CSAT, and transitioning to absolute evaluation for internal assessments and the CSAT as part of the '2028-2037 National Education Development Plan.'
Iman-ki, head of the Education Evaluation Research Institute at Yuhwa, positively assessed the expansion of essay-type evaluations, noting that it could move away from rote memorization and better assess students' thought processes and problem-solving abilities, aligning with the goals of the high school credit system.
However, he pointed out that ensuring 'objectivity and fairness in grading' poses the biggest challenge due to the nature of the CSAT, which sees hundreds of thousands of examinees. If discrepancies arise in scores among different graders for the same answers, the credibility of the exam could be severely undermined.
He also warned that a new form of private education focused on memorizing writing structures and answer formats could expand, and students' handwriting or language expression abilities might become variables outside of their academic competencies.
Iman-ki advised, "Instead of introducing lengthy essay-type questions on a large scale from the outset, it would be better to gradually implement questions that allow for relatively objective grading, such as short-answer questions in mathematics that focus on problem-solving processes."
Concerns were also raised regarding the proposed adjustment of the college admissions timeline under the guise of normalizing the second semester of the third year of high school. Iman-ki noted that if all processes, including document submissions, essays, interviews, and announcements of successful candidates, are conducted from after the CSAT until February of the following year, the schedule could become overly compressed, leading to poor evaluations by universities.
In fact, criticisms have emerged from the college admissions field regarding the impracticality of compressing the admissions timeline. A university admissions official stated, "Multiple grading is essential, but there remains the issue of how to handle significant score discrepancies among graders," emphasizing the need for clear evaluation criteria.
Regarding the proposal to delay the admissions timeline, the official remarked, "Compressing the schedule from after the CSAT to February overlooks the existing college transfer schedule concentrated in December and January," indicating that it is essentially unfeasible. As an alternative, they suggested referencing Germany's 'Abitur.'
The Abitur, mentioned by the university official, is Germany's university entrance qualification exam, which primarily consists of essay-type and oral evaluations. To ensure grading fairness, it clearly stipulates a dual grading system involving both internal and external teachers, and if significant score discrepancies arise, a third grader or committee intervenes to adjust the final score. Additionally, the exam and grading periods are conducted over weeks to months, allowing ample time.
Thus, for the full implementation of essay-type questions in the Korean CSAT, it is necessary to establish a clear agreement mechanism to address grading discrepancies and a thorough dual grading system, alongside a structural overhaul of the current compressed admissions timeline from November to February to ensure the quality of evaluations.
Teachers' unions are also calling for a measured approach based on concerns about fairness and practicality. The Korean Federation of Teachers' Associations stated, "In a situation where the high school credit system and the five-grade internal assessment system have just been fully implemented, discussing absolute evaluation for internal assessments and essay-type CSAT simultaneously is premature," adding, "It should not be enforced without ensuring transparency and fairness in grading and addressing concerns about increased private education."
The Korean Teachers and Education Workers Union also emphasized that the introduction of AI evaluation systems, mentioned as grading aids, should prioritize sufficient consultation with the field regarding data protection and the safeguarding of teachers' final judgment rights.
Ultimately, for the National Education Commission's college admissions reform plan to take off smoothly, it is essential to prioritize ample pilot operations and gradual implementation over hasty full-scale introduction. Additionally, education experts agree that to prevent the dilution of the CSAT and internal assessments from leading to the revival of university-specific exams or an increase in private education, a common differentiation system for selecting top-tier universities must be established, making social consensus a key to success.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.