The head of the U.S. Federal Reserve is refraining from signaling the future path of interest rates, while recent comments from senior Fed officials are effectively acting as policy signals in the market.
This aligns with Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's communication strategy of avoiding forward guidance and leaving judgments to economic indicators, drawing attention to how the remarks from the Fed leadership have influenced market expectations.
According to Yonhap News on October 4, John Williams, president of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, stated on September 29 that while it may be appropriate to raise the benchmark interest rate one more time by the end of the year, there is no need to rush.
Philip Jefferson, the Fed's vice chair, also mentioned on October 1 that any policy adjustments should be carefully considered based on data trends and forecasts, indicating that decision-making may take more time.
These comments were interpreted as suggesting a 'slowdown' in the pace of interest rate hikes, leading the market to lower expectations for an October rate increase.
Before Williams' remarks, the market had priced in about a 70% probability of a rate hike in October. However, following weaker-than-expected inflation data, expectations for a rate increase quickly diminished. The market's focus on the comments from these two officials came amid a lack of clear policy signals from Warsh.
As president of the New York Fed, Williams not only has a permanent vote on policy decisions but also traditionally serves as the vice chair of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). This position is considered part of the Fed's 'troika,' which includes the chair and vice chair, leading monetary policy. In the past, remarks from either the Fed vice chair or the New York Fed president have been seen as conveying the views of the entire troika.
Market experts view these speeches as a clear attempt to adjust market expectations, indicating that the Fed is adopting a more cautious approach to future policy actions.
According to Bloomberg, economists at Goldman Sachs have solidified their judgment that an October rate hike is unlikely based on these comments. Krishna Guha, chief economist at Evercore ISI, described the remarks from both officials as 'authoritative' messages.
Michael Feroli, chief economist at JPMorgan Chase, analyzed that the speeches were attempts to manage market expectations. He explained, 'Both speeches convey that there is no need to continuously raise rates at every meeting, and that the intervals between hikes can now be adjusted somewhat.'
However, there are differing interpretations regarding whether these remarks can be seen as typical forward guidance. Ellen Meade, an economics professor at Duke University, noted a subtle but clear distinction between forward guidance that presumes a rate change and guidance that suggests a slowdown in decision-making based on sufficient data.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.