Ambassador Rice admits error concerning Benghazi attack

By Park Sae-jin Posted : November 29, 2012, 07:50 Updated : January 1, 1970, 09:00
A US diplomat tipped to replace Secretary of State Hillary Clinton has admitted releasing incorrect information after September‘s attack on the American consulate in Libya. Ambassador Susan Rice said there had been no attempt to mislead the public, but Republicans were unconvinced.

After meeting Ms Rice on Tuesday, senators said they were troubled. The envoy said her initial line that the Benghazi attack appeared to have sprung from a protest had been wrong. The 11 September assault on the US consulate triggered a major political row over who knew what and when. Days afterwards, Rice, said in a series of TV interviews that it seemed to have developed out of protests over an anti-Islamic film.

Later intelligence reports suggested it was possibly tied to al-Qaeda affiliates. The attack left four Americans dead, including Ambassador Christopher Stevens.

After the meeting on Capitol Hill, Ms Rice said; “The talking points provided by the intelligence community, and the initial assessment upon which they were based, were incorrect in a key respect: there was no protest or demonstration in Benghazi.

However, the Republicans said questions remained unanswered. McCain said: ”We are significantly troubled by many of the answers that we got and some that we didn’t get concerning evidence that was leading up to the attack.“

Republicans are demanding a joint committee investigate the attack. Current Secretary of State Clinton is not expected to continue in the role for a second four-year term. The Obama administration would need the support of the Senate for any nomination to the post.

아주경제 앤드류 이 기자=

기사 이미지 확대 보기
닫기