The US-China summit in Beijing in May 2026 carried significant implications beyond merely managing bilateral relations. Underlying the discussions were complex calculations aimed at stabilizing the Middle East order, global energy flows, and international financial markets.
A key focus of the summit was the Iran nuclear issue and the stability of the Hormuz Strait. Although the official statements were crafted in restrained diplomatic language, they reflected a shared understanding between the US and China that managing the explosive crises in the Middle East is essential.
Currently, the global economy is precariously positioned atop three major powder kegs: the protracted war in Ukraine, the US-China technological rivalry over artificial intelligence and semiconductors, and the risks associated with Iran's nuclear program and the Hormuz Strait.
The Hormuz Strait is not just a maritime route; it is a vital energy artery through which approximately one-third of the world's oil trade passes. Oil and liquefied natural gas from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, and Iran traverse this narrow strait to reach Asia and Europe. Any blockade or military conflict in this area could lead to a rapid spike in international oil prices, shipping costs, and insurance premiums.
The US and Iran have been engaged in a long-standing tug-of-war over nuclear development. The US has maintained a firm stance against allowing Iran to approach the capability to manufacture nuclear weapons, while Iran asserts that its nuclear development is a sovereign right for peaceful purposes.
The crux of the issue lies in the level of uranium enrichment and the scope of nuclear facility operations. The West suspects that Iran has approached the final stages of nuclear weapon production, while Iran contends that US unilateral sanctions and pressure have exacerbated tensions.
The situation is further complicated by Israel's concerns. Israel views Iran's nuclear armament as a direct threat to its national survival, leading to ongoing discussions within Israel about the possibility of preemptive strikes if necessary. Most military tensions in the Middle East have revolved around Iran's nuclear facilities and Israel's security issues.
However, the atmosphere following the Beijing summit appears to be shifting. Both the US and China recognize the current reality that they cannot afford a full-scale conflict in the Middle East. The US is already burdened with significant financial obligations, political pressures from the upcoming elections, and support for Ukraine. Similarly, China is grappling with economic slowdown, declining exports, and real estate risks, making stable energy supplies crucial.
Consequently, analysts suggest that both countries are beginning to prioritize a management system to prevent dangerous escalations over the complete resolution of the Iran nuclear issue. This means that rather than seeking total nuclear disarmament, a realistic compromise may involve a freeze on certain nuclear activities, enhanced international monitoring, and guarantees for safe navigation through the Hormuz Strait.
China's role is becoming increasingly significant. Over the past decade, China and Iran have developed a closer relationship, with China emerging as one of Iran's largest oil importers and a critical lifeline for its economy.
The two nations have signed long-term economic cooperation agreements, expanding collaboration in energy, infrastructure, railways, ports, and telecommunications. Iran serves as a key hub in China's Belt and Road Initiative, connecting Central Asia, the Middle East, and Europe. Geopolitically, Iran has historically been a strategic point linking the Silk Road and the Hormuz Strait since the days of the Persian Empire.
For China, Iran is not merely an oil-producing nation; it is a strategic buffer against the US-led maritime order and a crucial pillar for maintaining energy security. Despite international sanctions, China has continued to import Iranian oil through various means, with Chinese refineries consistently securing discounted Iranian crude, which plays a significant role in stabilizing China's industrial economy.
Conversely, Iran also finds itself in dire need of China. With restricted access to international financial networks due to US and Western sanctions, China has effectively become Iran's largest trading partner. Investments from Chinese companies and their participation in infrastructure projects are vital supports for Iran's economy.
However, China cannot unconditionally support Iran. The Chinese economy remains deeply interconnected with the US and European markets, and prolonged instability in the Middle East could lead to soaring energy prices and disruptions in maritime logistics, adversely affecting China's own economy.
This is where the significance of the recent US-China summit comes into play. The US seeks China's cooperation in managing Iran to a certain extent, while China hopes the US will refrain from excessively escalating tensions in the Middle East. In essence, both nations find overlapping interests in managing risks in the region while continuing to compete.
So, when could the joint statement on the stability of navigation through the Hormuz Strait and the freeze on Iran's nuclear activities take effect? Diplomats are paying attention to the possibility of a phased approach.
In the short term, there is a strong likelihood of reaching an informal agreement on military restraint and ensuring safe passage through the strait. Subsequently, discussions may include enhanced monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency, some limitations on uranium enrichment, and conditional easing of sanctions.
Of course, many variables remain. The differing positions of hardliners within Israel and Iran's Revolutionary Guard, the political landscape surrounding the US elections, and proxy conflicts in the Middle East could all disrupt negotiations. Particularly, even a minor military clash could lead to a sharp increase in international oil prices. Nevertheless, the world is currently opting for 'risk management' over 'complete victory.'
This reflects a harsh realism. The US, China, Iran, and even Israel are all acutely aware of the costs of full-scale war. If a large-scale conflict erupts in the Middle East, the global economy would inevitably plunge back into inflation and supply chain shocks.
For South Korea, this issue is even more pressing. The country has a high dependency on energy imports. If supplies of oil and liquefied natural gas from the Middle East are disrupted, the manufacturing sector, logistics, and electricity costs would all come under simultaneous pressure. In particular, if the Hormuz Strait becomes unstable, the South Korean economy would face severe repercussions.
Conversely, if stability in the strait and a reduction in tensions in the Middle East can be achieved, it could provide relief for the South Korean economy. Stabilizing international oil prices is likely to lead to improvements in inflation, exchange rates, and trade balances. Ultimately, the US-China summit in Beijing is not merely a diplomatic event between the two countries.
It represents a consensus that the global energy order, the last safety net for the world economy, must not be undermined amid the competition for supremacy in artificial intelligence and semiconductors. The oil tankers traversing the deserts of the Middle East and the diplomatic discussions in Beijing may seem like entirely different worlds. However, they are, in fact, interconnected.
In an era of global hegemony, energy remains the driving force of civilization, and the lifeblood of that energy still flows through the Hormuz Strait.
A key focus of the summit was the Iran nuclear issue and the stability of the Hormuz Strait. Although the official statements were crafted in restrained diplomatic language, they reflected a shared understanding between the US and China that managing the explosive crises in the Middle East is essential.
Currently, the global economy is precariously positioned atop three major powder kegs: the protracted war in Ukraine, the US-China technological rivalry over artificial intelligence and semiconductors, and the risks associated with Iran's nuclear program and the Hormuz Strait.
The Hormuz Strait is not just a maritime route; it is a vital energy artery through which approximately one-third of the world's oil trade passes. Oil and liquefied natural gas from Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, Kuwait, Qatar, Iraq, and Iran traverse this narrow strait to reach Asia and Europe. Any blockade or military conflict in this area could lead to a rapid spike in international oil prices, shipping costs, and insurance premiums.
The US and Iran have been engaged in a long-standing tug-of-war over nuclear development. The US has maintained a firm stance against allowing Iran to approach the capability to manufacture nuclear weapons, while Iran asserts that its nuclear development is a sovereign right for peaceful purposes.
The crux of the issue lies in the level of uranium enrichment and the scope of nuclear facility operations. The West suspects that Iran has approached the final stages of nuclear weapon production, while Iran contends that US unilateral sanctions and pressure have exacerbated tensions.
The situation is further complicated by Israel's concerns. Israel views Iran's nuclear armament as a direct threat to its national survival, leading to ongoing discussions within Israel about the possibility of preemptive strikes if necessary. Most military tensions in the Middle East have revolved around Iran's nuclear facilities and Israel's security issues.
However, the atmosphere following the Beijing summit appears to be shifting. Both the US and China recognize the current reality that they cannot afford a full-scale conflict in the Middle East. The US is already burdened with significant financial obligations, political pressures from the upcoming elections, and support for Ukraine. Similarly, China is grappling with economic slowdown, declining exports, and real estate risks, making stable energy supplies crucial.
Consequently, analysts suggest that both countries are beginning to prioritize a management system to prevent dangerous escalations over the complete resolution of the Iran nuclear issue. This means that rather than seeking total nuclear disarmament, a realistic compromise may involve a freeze on certain nuclear activities, enhanced international monitoring, and guarantees for safe navigation through the Hormuz Strait.
China's role is becoming increasingly significant. Over the past decade, China and Iran have developed a closer relationship, with China emerging as one of Iran's largest oil importers and a critical lifeline for its economy.
The two nations have signed long-term economic cooperation agreements, expanding collaboration in energy, infrastructure, railways, ports, and telecommunications. Iran serves as a key hub in China's Belt and Road Initiative, connecting Central Asia, the Middle East, and Europe. Geopolitically, Iran has historically been a strategic point linking the Silk Road and the Hormuz Strait since the days of the Persian Empire.
For China, Iran is not merely an oil-producing nation; it is a strategic buffer against the US-led maritime order and a crucial pillar for maintaining energy security. Despite international sanctions, China has continued to import Iranian oil through various means, with Chinese refineries consistently securing discounted Iranian crude, which plays a significant role in stabilizing China's industrial economy.
Conversely, Iran also finds itself in dire need of China. With restricted access to international financial networks due to US and Western sanctions, China has effectively become Iran's largest trading partner. Investments from Chinese companies and their participation in infrastructure projects are vital supports for Iran's economy.
However, China cannot unconditionally support Iran. The Chinese economy remains deeply interconnected with the US and European markets, and prolonged instability in the Middle East could lead to soaring energy prices and disruptions in maritime logistics, adversely affecting China's own economy.
This is where the significance of the recent US-China summit comes into play. The US seeks China's cooperation in managing Iran to a certain extent, while China hopes the US will refrain from excessively escalating tensions in the Middle East. In essence, both nations find overlapping interests in managing risks in the region while continuing to compete.
So, when could the joint statement on the stability of navigation through the Hormuz Strait and the freeze on Iran's nuclear activities take effect? Diplomats are paying attention to the possibility of a phased approach.
In the short term, there is a strong likelihood of reaching an informal agreement on military restraint and ensuring safe passage through the strait. Subsequently, discussions may include enhanced monitoring by the International Atomic Energy Agency, some limitations on uranium enrichment, and conditional easing of sanctions.
Of course, many variables remain. The differing positions of hardliners within Israel and Iran's Revolutionary Guard, the political landscape surrounding the US elections, and proxy conflicts in the Middle East could all disrupt negotiations. Particularly, even a minor military clash could lead to a sharp increase in international oil prices. Nevertheless, the world is currently opting for 'risk management' over 'complete victory.'
This reflects a harsh realism. The US, China, Iran, and even Israel are all acutely aware of the costs of full-scale war. If a large-scale conflict erupts in the Middle East, the global economy would inevitably plunge back into inflation and supply chain shocks.
For South Korea, this issue is even more pressing. The country has a high dependency on energy imports. If supplies of oil and liquefied natural gas from the Middle East are disrupted, the manufacturing sector, logistics, and electricity costs would all come under simultaneous pressure. In particular, if the Hormuz Strait becomes unstable, the South Korean economy would face severe repercussions.
Conversely, if stability in the strait and a reduction in tensions in the Middle East can be achieved, it could provide relief for the South Korean economy. Stabilizing international oil prices is likely to lead to improvements in inflation, exchange rates, and trade balances. Ultimately, the US-China summit in Beijing is not merely a diplomatic event between the two countries.
It represents a consensus that the global energy order, the last safety net for the world economy, must not be undermined amid the competition for supremacy in artificial intelligence and semiconductors. The oil tankers traversing the deserts of the Middle East and the diplomatic discussions in Beijing may seem like entirely different worlds. However, they are, in fact, interconnected.
In an era of global hegemony, energy remains the driving force of civilization, and the lifeblood of that energy still flows through the Hormuz Strait.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.