Kim Yong-beom, the Chief Policy Officer at the Blue House, has left his position after 15 months in the administration of President Lee Jae-myung. While he was a key architect of the national growth strategy centered on artificial intelligence (AI) and semiconductors, ongoing instability in the real estate and financial markets placed him at the center of accountability for policy failures.
Kim, a seasoned economic bureaucrat who entered public service through the 30th National Examination for Public Administration, previously served as the First Vice Minister of the Ministry of Economy and Finance and as the Vice Chairman of the Financial Services Commission. He was appointed as the first Chief Policy Officer under President Lee, overseeing economic, industrial, real estate, financial, and social policies.
One of Kim's most significant achievements was placing AI and semiconductors at the core of the national growth strategy. He led efforts to secure graphics processing units (GPUs), establish AI data centers, and expand infrastructure for power and water, integrating industrial, financial, and fiscal policies into a cohesive package.
Kim was also instrumental in detailing the three major mega projects and seven seed policies proposed by President Lee. These initiatives aim to concentrate large-scale investments in strategic industries across regions to alleviate the concentration of economic activity in the capital area and enhance the nation's potential growth rate.
Expanding cooperation with global tech giants was another key responsibility for Kim. He coordinated meetings between President Lee and leaders such as Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI; Jensen Huang, CEO of NVIDIA; and Demis Hassabis, CEO of Google DeepMind.
The 'productive fiscal' approach reflected in next year's budget embodies Kim's policy philosophy. This strategy aims not only to use fiscal measures to support the economy but also to invest in AI and advanced industries to expand the economic pie, which would subsequently enhance tax revenue and fiscal capacity. The establishment of a future response fund to utilize surplus tax revenue generated during economic upturns for fiscal stability and future strategic investments aligns with this vision.
What set Kim apart from previous policy chiefs was his commitment to public policy communication. He actively engaged in lengthy posts on Facebook and participated in media interviews to explain the background and direction of policies. His writings were often interpreted as signals of forthcoming government initiatives.
However, this proactive communication became a double-edged sword. Concerns arose when he publicly shared personal ideas that had not undergone internal coordination, leading to confusion between the official policies of the Blue House and his personal views. A notable example was his proposal for a 'national dividend' to return excess profits and tax revenues from the semiconductor and AI industries to the public.
His controversial remarks, particularly the phrase “We must build, no matter what,” regarding the real estate crisis, also sparked debate. While Kim explained that he was expressing urgency in exploring all available land, including green belts, industrial zones, and public sites, critics deemed his language too harsh for a senior official overseeing economic policy.
The final blow came after the introduction of a single-stock leveraged exchange-traded fund (ETF) targeting Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix in late May, which led to increased market volatility.
Ultimately, President Lee's decision to accept Kim's resignation appears to be a response to declining approval ratings and a desire to demonstrate a commitment to government renewal. The swift acceptance of Kim's resignation supports this interpretation. With Kim's departure, there is growing interest in how the direction of economic policy may shift.
Given the intention behind his resignation to enhance responsiveness to public sentiment, there are expectations for a more flexible approach in areas such as real estate policy.
A Blue House official stated during a press briefing that it is not unusual for advisors to have an average tenure of 1 year and 2 months to 6 months, emphasizing that the current Chief of Staff and other senior officials are effectively fulfilling their roles, ensuring continuity in operations until future appointments are made.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.