U.S. Forces Korea Commander Javier Brunson delivers a keynote speech at the 2nd Korea-U.S. Joint Policy Forum at the War Memorial of Korea in Yongsan, Seoul. [Photo courtesy of the Korea-U.S. Alliance]
North Korea has strongly criticized U.S. Forces Korea Commander Javier Brunson's remarks about a "dagger," claiming that the U.S. is using South Korea as a geopolitical tool to contain China.
According to Yonhap News on June 3, the Korean Central News Agency reported on an article by international affairs commentator Kim Myung-chul, titled "The Dagger Remarks in the Heart of Asia: A Manifestation of U.S. Hegemony and Cold War Mentality."
Kim analyzed the implications of Brunson's comments and subsequent clarifications, stating, "This is not an impulsive personal claim but reflects the strategic perspective of past U.S. administrations that have sought to use South Korea as a key geopolitical tool in their regional strategy aimed at containing China." He noted that since the end of the Cold War, the U.S. has focused on establishing military dominance in the Asia-Pacific through its rebalancing strategy and Indo-Pacific strategy.
He listed examples of U.S.-South Korea military cooperation, including the deployment of the THAAD missile defense system, joint exercises, the introduction of drones and fighter jets, and collaboration on nuclear submarines and the integration of nuclear and conventional forces. He argued that these actions ensure the "strategic flexibility" of U.S. forces in the region while directly linking South Korea's role to U.S. efforts to contain China.
Furthermore, he condemned the U.S. as the "main culprit of peace destruction" that has turned the Korean Peninsula and surrounding areas into a battleground for factional confrontation and a new Cold War. He warned that the U.S.'s attempts to strengthen collective deterrence will inevitably provoke security concerns among neighboring powers, leading to increased cooperation to counterbalance these threats.
Recently, Brunson stated in a podcast hosted by the U.S. Army War College that when China looks from its eastern coast, it sees South Korea, described as a dagger in the heart of Asia, and Japan, which acts as a defensive wall as China seeks to expand beyond the South China Sea.
This has been interpreted as a demonstration of strategic flexibility aimed at using U.S. forces not only for deterring North Korea but also for countering China in the region. The Chinese Embassy in South Korea also reacted strongly, stating, "Your remarks clearly crossed the line."
Meanwhile, North Korea's commentary was presented in the form of a personal opinion piece rather than an official statement, suggesting a measured response. The article was not published in the Rodong Sinmun, the newspaper read by North Korean citizens.
Additionally, North Korea criticized the Japanese government for easing restrictions on the export of lethal weapons. International security analyst Kim Rye-won stated in a piece for the Central News Agency that Japan is expanding its military industry through vast arms sales and is determined to realize its ambitions for military power, abandoning even the facade of being a "peaceful nation." He called for thorough opposition to Japan's increasingly reckless militarization, which poses a serious threat to global peace and security.
According to Yonhap News on June 3, the Korean Central News Agency reported on an article by international affairs commentator Kim Myung-chul, titled "The Dagger Remarks in the Heart of Asia: A Manifestation of U.S. Hegemony and Cold War Mentality."
Kim analyzed the implications of Brunson's comments and subsequent clarifications, stating, "This is not an impulsive personal claim but reflects the strategic perspective of past U.S. administrations that have sought to use South Korea as a key geopolitical tool in their regional strategy aimed at containing China." He noted that since the end of the Cold War, the U.S. has focused on establishing military dominance in the Asia-Pacific through its rebalancing strategy and Indo-Pacific strategy.
He listed examples of U.S.-South Korea military cooperation, including the deployment of the THAAD missile defense system, joint exercises, the introduction of drones and fighter jets, and collaboration on nuclear submarines and the integration of nuclear and conventional forces. He argued that these actions ensure the "strategic flexibility" of U.S. forces in the region while directly linking South Korea's role to U.S. efforts to contain China.
Furthermore, he condemned the U.S. as the "main culprit of peace destruction" that has turned the Korean Peninsula and surrounding areas into a battleground for factional confrontation and a new Cold War. He warned that the U.S.'s attempts to strengthen collective deterrence will inevitably provoke security concerns among neighboring powers, leading to increased cooperation to counterbalance these threats.
Recently, Brunson stated in a podcast hosted by the U.S. Army War College that when China looks from its eastern coast, it sees South Korea, described as a dagger in the heart of Asia, and Japan, which acts as a defensive wall as China seeks to expand beyond the South China Sea.
This has been interpreted as a demonstration of strategic flexibility aimed at using U.S. forces not only for deterring North Korea but also for countering China in the region. The Chinese Embassy in South Korea also reacted strongly, stating, "Your remarks clearly crossed the line."
Meanwhile, North Korea's commentary was presented in the form of a personal opinion piece rather than an official statement, suggesting a measured response. The article was not published in the Rodong Sinmun, the newspaper read by North Korean citizens.
Additionally, North Korea criticized the Japanese government for easing restrictions on the export of lethal weapons. International security analyst Kim Rye-won stated in a piece for the Central News Agency that Japan is expanding its military industry through vast arms sales and is determined to realize its ambitions for military power, abandoning even the facade of being a "peaceful nation." He called for thorough opposition to Japan's increasingly reckless militarization, which poses a serious threat to global peace and security.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.