The wealth gap among young adults is widening, prompting calls for more effective asset formation support policies. While the government promotes asset formation initiatives highlighting high interest rates, many vulnerable young individuals remain in a support gap.
According to a report by the National Assembly Legislative Research Service titled 'What Does the Youth Asset Formation Support Program Mean for Vulnerable Youth?', the average net worth gap between the top 20% and bottom 20% of young households is 40.4 times.
The Legislative Research Service analyzed microdata from the National Data Agency's Household Financial Welfare Survey, revealing that as of last year, the average net worth of the top 20% of young households was 930.22 million won, while the bottom 20% had only 23.01 million won. This disparity is attributed to limited savings capacity and crisis resilience during youth, as well as the inheritance of parental assets.
Additionally, 63.0% of young households carry financial debt, making them a generation with more debt than accumulated assets. The average debt for households headed by individuals under 39 is 95.48 million won, with financial debt amounting to 82.72 million won, exceeding the overall average of 67.95 million won. The ratio of financial debt to savings stands at 131.1%, surpassing 100%.
The government has initiated asset formation support programs to reduce wealth disparities among young people and assist newcomers to the workforce. These include two main types: welfare matching savings for low-income individuals and financial policy products for the general youth population.
Among these, the Youth Future Savings Account allows for a monthly contribution of up to 500,000 won for three years, with effective interest rates comparable to regular savings accounts yielding 13.2% to 14.4% annually, and preferential rates of 18.2% to 19.4%. For example, a small business employee earning 36 million won or less can accumulate up to 22.55 million won by contributing 500,000 won monthly for three years.
The youth asset formation support program enables the accumulation of assets that would be difficult to achieve independently. The effective yield of the preferential Youth Future Savings Account is comparable to savings accounts yielding 18% to 19% annually. Furthermore, the Youth Tomorrow Savings Account helps prevent young individuals in working poverty from qualifying for livelihood benefits.
However, the current support programs have a significant flaw: they require savings, making it impossible for unemployed youth to participate. To enroll in the Youth Tomorrow Savings Account, a monthly income of at least 100,000 won from work or business is necessary, while the Youth Future Savings Account requires reportable income to the National Tax Service. This leaves many young individuals in urgent need of asset formation in a support gap.
Moreover, the difficulty of maintaining long-term savings is another area needing improvement. The early withdrawal rate for the Youth Leap Account rose from 8.2% in 2023 to nearly 15.9% the following year. Early withdrawal results in the loss of tax benefits on government contributions, which can lead to benefits being concentrated among those with sufficient savings capacity.
Complicated regulations prohibiting multiple enrollments also make it challenging for young people to find suitable programs. Additionally, the varying terms and conditions of the Youth Hope Savings Account, Youth Leap Account, and Youth Future Savings Account have contributed to confusion.
In response, the Legislative Research Service emphasizes the need to design asset formation support programs centered on vulnerable youth. It suggests differentiating matching rates based on income and easing criteria for suspending contributions and partial withdrawals in cases of unemployment or illness to prevent early withdrawals.
It also highlights the importance of integrating and systematizing dispersed programs while considering financial sustainability. Kim Dae-sung, a legislative researcher, stated, 'We need to reorganize programs scattered across different departments from the user's perspective and integrate the legal foundations of these dispersed programs rather than creating new individual initiatives. Since asset formation support requires ongoing financial input for several years until maturity, we should consider gradual expansion of the target and level of support, as well as the consolidation of similar and overlapping programs for resource redistribution.'
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.