The Hidden Costs of Subscription Services: Are They Really Cheaper?

by Yun Seok Jun Posted : October 22, 2026, 17:44Updated : October 22, 2026, 17:44
<Editor’s Note>
When purchasing a product, we first check the price tag. But can we accurately assess the value of a product based solely on that number? Price comparisons become difficult when capacities differ, and various fees or additional costs can alter the final payment amount. There can be significant differences between the price displayed and the actual costs borne by consumers, as well as the value they receive for their money. 'The Hidden Costs of Pricing' examines the structure of prices we encounter daily and highlights the differences in costs and value that consumers often overlook.
94.8% Have Used Subscription Services, Expanding Across Daily Life

"Is signing up cheaply the same as using it affordably?"

This is the opening question for the third installment of our series.

Recently, Party Center, a subsidiary of Genesis BBQ Group, launched a subscription service providing regular lunches for employees at the Dongtan Hanaro Distribution Center and partner companies. This 'corporate-customized lunch subscription service' considers the size of the workforce, work environment, and meal demand. It illustrates how subscription models are spreading across various aspects of daily life.
 
The subscription economy is permeating the consumer market. According to a report by the Korea Chamber of Commerce and Industry, 94.8% of 1,000 surveyed adults have experience using subscription services. Preferences for subscription services vary by age group, with 'generative AI' being most popular among those in their 20s and 30s, while 'health and home appliances' ranked highest among those in their 40s and 60s.
 
Why do consumers choose subscriptions over ownership? The Chamber of Commerce attributes this trend to a shift towards valuing experiences over ownership, along with the economic efficiency of not having to pay a large upfront cost to access the latest products or services as needed. Consumers cited the advantages of subscription services as 'access to the latest products and services (69.9%)', 'personalized service (64.9%)', and 'initial low costs (58.8%)'.
 
As subscription services expand from meals to content and home appliances, the cost structure for consumers is also changing. While paying a fixed monthly amount reduces initial spending, the total cost over the contract period can exceed that of a one-time purchase. This is particularly true for home appliance subscriptions that include management services, making it difficult to assess economic viability based solely on monthly payments.
 
LG Electronics reported over 2 trillion won in subscription business revenue last year. This figure nearly doubles the annual revenue of 962.9 billion won announced in 2023 when the company stated its intention to expand into the service and subscription sector. Samsung Electronics also aims to achieve 1 trillion won in sales (excluding mobile) within a year of launching its AI subscription service in 2024.
 
The strengths of subscription services are also evident in after-sales service (AS). Most home appliance subscription products include regular visits from professional technicians for maintenance. While the warranty period for purchased products typically lasts only 1-2 years, subscription products offer service throughout the contract period, highlighting the convenience factor over ownership.
Lower Initial Costs May Lead to Higher Total Payments; Assess Management Service Value

Is a subscription service truly cheaper? Without applying discounts, the one-time price for a refrigerator sold by Samsung Electronics is 2.54 million won. If subscribed for three years, the total payment would amount to 3.31452 million won, or 92,070 won per month, which is about 770,000 won more than the one-time purchase price. It is essential to compare how monthly payments and total costs vary depending on the subscription duration.
 
This example shows that while the monthly fee may seem manageable, the total expenditure over the contract period can surpass the one-time purchase price. However, actual cost differences can vary based on the product's contract terms and the management services provided.
 
Ultimately, while subscriptions reduce initial costs, they can lead to higher overall expenses for consumers in the long run. Especially if decisions are made based solely on monthly payments, consumers may not fully grasp the total expenditure involved, making it crucial to consider both overall spending and the range of services offered.
 
Subscription fees may reflect not only the product price but also the costs associated with warranties and management services during the contract period. Therefore, determining whether a subscription is more economical than a one-time purchase cannot be based solely on monthly payments. Consumers should weigh the services they need against the total costs they will incur over time.
 
Consequently, when choosing a home appliance subscription, consumers should verify not only the monthly payments over the contract period but also the total amount paid and the range of services available. It is particularly important to check the scope of free repairs, the number of maintenance visits, and whether cleaning and consumable replacements are included, comparing these with the management costs that would need to be borne separately for a one-time purchase.



* This article has been translated by AI.