The United States has suggested the possibility of lowering tariffs on steel and other materials used in the Alaska liquefied natural gas (LNG) project, creating a mix of optimism and caution within the domestic steel industry.
While new contract opportunities are anticipated due to the construction of large pipelines and LNG terminals, there is skepticism about the actual reduction of U.S. steel tariffs amid ongoing trade uncertainties.
According to the Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy, South Korea and the U.S. have agreed to review the feasibility of the Alaska LNG project through a strategic investment initiative called 'Project North.' In this context, U.S. officials indicated they might lower tariffs on steel and other materials to encourage participation from South Korean companies.
The domestic steel industry is focusing on supply opportunities for pipes used in gas pipelines and plates needed for LNG terminal construction. The Alaska LNG project involves building a large pipeline to transport natural gas produced in the north to the south, along with an export terminal. The construction of long-distance pipelines requires a significant amount of steel, which could expand contract opportunities for companies like SeAH Steel and POSCO, as well as Hyundai Steel.
If tariff reductions materialize, it could positively impact the price competitiveness of South Korean materials. Notably, South Korea's steel exports to the U.S. from January to August this year reached 958,707 tons, a 36.2% increase compared to the same period last year. With ongoing demand for U.S. energy infrastructure, a tariff reduction could further boost export growth. Currently, the U.S. imposes a 50% tariff on South Korean steel and aluminum products.
However, the industry remains cautious about whether actual tariff reductions will occur. Frequent changes in trade policy under the Trump administration raise concerns, and if these benefits are limited to the Alaska LNG project, the overall impact on the domestic steel industry may be limited.
Moreover, there are growing pressures in the U.S. to tighten import regulations on South Korean steel. The American Iron and Steel Institute (AISI) recently sent a joint letter to the U.S. government, citing a significant increase in imports of South Korean steel and calling for additional regulations. They noted that imports of South Korean long products have surged more than sixfold in two years and are demanding the introduction of a tariff-rate quota (TRQ) that would increase tariffs on quantities exceeding a certain threshold.
The decision to proceed with the project remains uncertain. The South Korean government has stated that this agreement does not guarantee investment and that it will decide on participation after reviewing commercial viability and domestic legal requirements. Ultimately, the actual benefits for domestic steel companies will depend on the confirmation of the project, the scope and applicability of tariff reductions, and the actual supply volumes.
A steel industry official remarked, "The U.S. prioritizes the protection of its domestic steel industry, so it is uncertain how flexibly existing tariff policies will be applied for a specific project. Even if tariffs are lowered, if conditions such as prioritizing the purchase of U.S. products or local sourcing are attached, domestic steel companies may not receive the expected benefits."
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.