The German company Delivery Hero is considering the sale of Woowa Brothers, the operator of Baedal Minjok (Baemin), marking a significant turning point in South Korea's platform market. According to investment banking sources, JP Morgan, the advisor for the sale, has distributed teaser letters to major domestic and international companies, including Naver, Uber, Alibaba, and DoorDash, as well as some private equity firms. However, it appears that the acquisition process has not yet formally begun, nor has any specific company confirmed its intention to acquire.
Viewing this situation merely as a sale of a delivery app misses the essence of the matter. While Baemin is a food ordering service, it also accumulates data on local businesses, consumer patterns, payment flows, and logistics routes. Delivery apps have evolved beyond just food ordering to become lifestyle data platforms. The identity of Baemin's new owner could significantly impact the competitive landscape of South Korea's platform market, the transaction conditions for small business owners and consumers, and the ecosystem of delivery workers.
Woowa Brothers was founded in 2011 by Kim Bong-jin, and in 2019, Delivery Hero acquired an 88% stake in the company for €3.6 billion, approximately 4.8 trillion won. Reports indicate that the joint venture established by Delivery Hero and Woowa Brothers in Singapore holds the majority of the shares. Delivery Hero is reportedly expecting a valuation of around 8 trillion won, which is about 12 times the average operating profit over the past two years.
The issue at hand is the price. While Woowa Brothers' revenue has grown, its operating profit has declined. Reports indicate that Woowa Brothers' operating profit was 699.8 billion won in 2023, projected to decrease to 640.8 billion won in 2024 and 592.8 billion won in 2025. Increased competition with Coupang Eats, rising marketing costs, and social pressure regarding delivery fees and commissions are straining profitability. The 8 trillion won price tag is seen as both attractive for a platform asset and, conversely, as expensive.
The context behind Delivery Hero's consideration of a sale is also crucial. The company faces significant debt and financial burdens, necessitating liquidity. Reports indicate that Delivery Hero's debt stood at €6.166 billion, approximately 9.25 trillion won, with a debt ratio of around 231% as of the end of last year. Delivery Hero has already begun global asset restructuring, including the sale of its Taiwanese subsidiary Foodpanda to Grab. The review of Woowa Brothers' sale should be viewed as part of this financial restructuring trend.
Uber's mention in this context is clear. The company has expanded beyond ride-hailing to include food delivery, logistics, and payment sectors, making it a global mobility platform. With its experience in the delivery market through Uber Eats, acquiring Baemin or pursuing strategic cooperation could significantly enhance Uber's entry into the South Korean delivery market. However, the South Korean market is complex, with intricate regulations and stakeholder interests, making it challenging for global companies to enter based solely on market share.
Naver's interest in Baemin is similarly motivated. As South Korea's largest platform, Naver offers services in search, advertising, shopping, reservations, payments, and mapping. A merger with Baemin could strengthen a lifestyle platform structure that connects search, ordering, payment, and local advertising. Particularly as Coupang Eats and Coupang's commerce ecosystem expand, Naver's need to secure offline consumer data has grown. However, if Naver pursues a direct acquisition, it may face issues related to fair trade, platform monopolization, and potential backlash from small business owners.
The mention of Alibaba and DoorDash highlights the international nature of this transaction. Alibaba has experience connecting commerce, logistics, and payment ecosystems, while DoorDash is a strong player in the U.S. food delivery market. However, the competition between Baemin and Coupang Eats is already fierce in South Korea, and consumer expectations are high. Foreign companies may find it difficult to succeed based solely on capital; they must also demonstrate operational capability, understand local markets, navigate regulations, and ensure social acceptance.
One critical aspect of this potential sale is fair trade. When Delivery Hero acquired Woowa Brothers, the Korea Fair Trade Commission approved the deal on the condition that the sale of Yogiyo, another delivery app, was completed due to concerns over monopolization in the delivery app market. Reuters reported that the approval of Delivery Hero's acquisition of Woowa Brothers was contingent upon the sale of Yogiyo. The identity of Baemin's new owner could again become a key variable in assessing competition restrictions.
The delivery platform industry is one of the most complex sectors in terms of stakeholder interests. Consumers seek low delivery fees and fast service, while small business owners demand lower commissions and reduced advertising costs. Delivery workers desire stable income and safety. Platforms must balance profitability with growth. These four demands are often at odds with one another. Even with a new owner, if this structural tension is not resolved, the same conflicts are likely to recur.
Particularly concerning is the potential for private equity firms to acquire the company, which may lead to increased pressure to raise fees or cut costs to enhance profitability. Conversely, if a strategic investor from big tech acquires Baemin, the focus may shift from short-term profits to data and ecosystem expansion, but this could intensify concerns about platform monopolization. The question is not just who buys the company, but what operational principles they will establish.
From a domestic industry perspective, the issue of 'platform sovereignty' arises. Baemin is already under German capital control. While it is not unusual for it to be transferred to another global company, the deeper integration of food ordering and local business data into foreign platforms cannot be taken lightly. The nationality of data cannot be judged solely by the nationality of capital, but for platforms closely tied to citizens' lives, data management and fair market operation principles must be clearly defined.
However, excessive government intervention in market transactions is also undesirable. Mergers and acquisitions fundamentally belong in the market's domain. Yet, companies like delivery platforms that significantly impact citizens' lives, small businesses, and labor markets differ from typical manufacturing sales. Fair trade reviews, personal data protection, fee transparency, rider safety, and consumer protection standards must be rigorously examined.
It remains uncertain whether this transaction will materialize. The high price, complex interests, and significant regulatory risks contribute to this uncertainty. Some private equity firms reportedly feel burdened by acquiring consumer-facing companies. Following the Homeplus incident, market caution regarding large-scale B2C acquisitions has increased. Therefore, it is essential to clearly distinguish between 'initiating a sale' and 'confirming an acquisition' at this stage.
Nonetheless, the importance of this issue lies in the fact that Baemin is not just an app. It is a point where the daily lives of South Korean consumers, the revenues of small business owners, and the livelihoods of platform workers intersect. A change in the ownership structure of this company could shake the market order. The new owner of the delivery app will not only be acquiring a business but also taking on social responsibilities.
Whether it is Naver, Uber, Alibaba, DoorDash, or a private equity firm, the core question remains: Will they view Baemin as an asset to be resold at a higher price, or as a responsible infrastructure for sustainably operating a South Korean lifestyle platform? If the former, conflicts will intensify; if the latter, a new order in the platform market could emerge.
The speculation surrounding Baemin's sale poses critical questions for South Korea's platform industry. Who will reap the benefits of growth, who will bear the costs, and who will control the data? The competition among delivery apps is no longer just a battle over discount coupons; it is a war for platform supremacy over lifestyle data, payments, logistics, and local businesses.
Regardless of whether this transaction ultimately succeeds or fails, South Korea cannot avoid confronting these issues. The nation must choose whether to leave the future of the platform industry solely to the market or to establish fair rules and social responsibilities. The search for Baemin's new owner signals not just a corporate sale but a preview of the next chapter in South Korea's digital economy.
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.