The South Korean government's ambitious plans for balanced national development through the 'Seoul National University 10 Project' and the establishment of new national medical schools are facing significant obstacles. The selection process has sparked fierce backlash from universities and local governments that were excluded, raising concerns that a well-intentioned policy could devolve into regional favoritism and political strife.
According to reports from the education sector and local governments, the Ministry of Education announced on September 1 that Pusan National University, Chonnam National University, and Chungnam National University were selected for the 'Seoul National University 10 Project.' In response, the six other regional national universities—Gangwon National University, Kyungpook National University, Gyeongsang National University, Jeonbuk National University, Jeju National University, and Chungbuk National University—along with their communities, expressed their disappointment and called for a full review of the decision. Compounding the issue, the long-sought establishment of new national medical schools has also become a contentious battleground among local governments.
“Is Our Region Being Condemned to Oblivion?”—Disappointment Among Excluded Universities
The backlash from the communities of the excluded universities has been intense. The three selected institutions will receive approximately $700 million each this year, with funding increasing to $800 million next year, allowing them to establish advanced colleges and become hubs for artificial intelligence. In contrast, the six universities that did not make the cut are left to witness a significant funding gap.
In response, the presidents of the excluded universities, along with the nine regional national university presidents, are expected to jointly petition the government and the National Assembly to include all regional national universities in the support package. They argue that to achieve balanced national growth, all nine universities must lead development in their respective regions and are requesting a roadmap to support the remaining six universities starting in 2027.
Community organizations, local governments, and politicians from the excluded regions have also criticized the government, stating, “The government is creating a hierarchy among regional national universities.” They argue that while the government claims to be preventing regional decline, it is instead providing preferential treatment to specific areas, exacerbating regional disparities.
Medical School Establishment: Allies or Adversaries?—Intense Competition for New Schools
The initiative to establish new national medical schools in underserved areas is similarly fraught with challenges. Local governments are engaged in fierce competition over where to locate these new schools, with no room for compromise.
In regions pushing for new medical schools, local mayors, lawmakers, and citizens are rallying together, demanding that the schools be established in their cities. This has led to extreme tensions, including public protests and petitions. Some regions have even threatened legal action against the government or provincial offices if they are excluded from the process. What began as a noble effort to fill gaps in local healthcare has instead become a source of division among residents.
Tangled Web of Politics—Government Faces Dilemma
Given the current situation, the government's challenge in implementing these policies has deepened. With the application period for next year's admissions starting on September 7, ongoing debates about the credibility and fairness of the selection process are causing concern.
Moreover, political involvement is complicating matters. Lawmakers from the excluded regions, regardless of party affiliation, are likely to unite to challenge budget reviews or demand a redistribution of funds during the National Assembly's budget deliberations. This raises concerns that the government's strict evaluation criteria may be undermined by political pressures.
Education experts advise that the government must quickly present a clear plan to resolve these conflicts. One education official noted, “While objective evaluations are important, it is crucial to have a clear plan for additional support and relief measures for students and residents in the regions that feel left out.”
* This article has been translated by AI.
Copyright ⓒ Aju Press All rights reserved.